- The ponchos of Chiapas and globalization Virginia Postrel, Reason
- Why are prices so high in the Pacific? Stephen Howes, DevPolicy
- The problem of democracy…in 1848 Pamela Nogales, JHIBlog
- Management vs. Managerialism Chris Dillow, Stumbling & Mumbling
Author: Brandon Christensen
Nightcap
- Islam and the European Enlightenment the Economist
- Tales of a female bomber Lincoln Krause, War on the Rocks
- Christianity in China is uncrushable Charles Horner, Claremont Review of Books
- What would the ideal introduction to Catholicism look like? Paul J. Griffiths, Commonweal
World War I destroyed Christianity
That’s the argument I put forth in this week’s RealClearHistory column. As usual I frame the argument in the form of a “Top10,” and in this case I used battles. An excerpt:
6. Battle of Asiago: May 15 – June 10, 1916. Another nasty battle fought along the Austro-Italian Front, Asiago is considered a victory for Italy even though it lost more men than the Austro-Hungarians. Altogether, the surprise attack launched by the Hapsburgs inflicted severe casualties on the Italians, with the latter losing 140,000 men and the aggressor losing 100,000. The surprise did not work for the Hapsburgs, either, as their armies were turned back and the position continued to be held by the Italians. There is a beautiful war memorial dedicated to both sides in Asiago today, and there are no crosses to be found for the dead there.
Please, read the rest.
Nightcap
- Dutch Jews face tough, age-old questions Bruce Clark, Erasmus
- Elections signal the end of an era in Italy Joel Weickgenant, RealClearWorld
- Hamas dips its toes in regional politics Adnan Abu Amer, Al-Monitor
- Stunningly beautiful photos of art from Tibet Joshua Daugherty, JHIBlog
Nightcap
- The English-Scottish Border Alasdair McKillop, New Statesman
- How to change the course of history David Graeber, Eurozine
- Universities are destroying freedoms of speech and association Andrew Sullivan, New York Magazine
- Soviet Bloc’s environmental catastrophes James Bovard, Explore Freedom
Nightcap
- Blood on the land in Brazil Gregory Duff Morton, New York Review of Books
- “Blackness” in France and in America Sarah Claire Dunstan, JHIBlog
- What if prejudice isn’t the cause of racism? Blake Smith, Aeon
- Mexico is whooping the film world’s butt Ioan Grillo, New York Times
“Does Russia own a piece of the US?”
That’s the title of my latest piece over at RealClearHistory. An excerpt:
The Russian-American Company was run through Saint Petersburg and thus had a strict racial hierarchical code in place, in conformity with the latest beliefs about race at the time. The neighborhoods of Fort Ross were segregated, but an archaeologist at the University of California, Berkeley, Kent Lightfoot, has produced excellent research at Fort Ross, showing how the Company’s racist charter was unofficially ignored, with miscegenation widespread (“creoles” was even created as an official race for documentation purposes) and interethnic activities commonplace. The people inhabiting Fort Ross preferred to follow instead something the anthropologist Jean-Loup Amselle calls “mestizo logics.”
Please, show me some love.
Kent Lightfoot can be found at NOL here. Jean-Loup Amselle can be found at NOL here. I also give a shoutout to Andrei Znamenski‘s work in the piece, so be on the lookout for that.
I didn’t get to delve as much into this piece as I’d have liked to. I wanted to get more into the inner workings of the Russian-American Company and compare it to the Dutch East India Company, but that sounds like a tall task even for a PhD dissertation.
I don’t think I did a good enough job of highlighting just how rich Pacific Rim trade was in the early 19th century. I tried in vain to sneak a reference to Hawaiian laborers that could be found throughout the Pacific world at the time of Fort Ross’ founding, but I’ve got a 600 word limit.
Also, I wanted to highlight the fact that Native Americans weren’t losers in the opening up of the Pacific to the world. They were active participants in the globalization of the Pacific Rim trade. They were powerful. I don’t know if I’d focus on California Indians to highlight Native American actors. I’d probably focus on an area a little further north, in the Puget Sound-Vancouver area.
At any rate, hope you enjoy the piece!
Nightcap
- A Brief History of Tomorrow David Berlinski, Inference
- The Invention of World History S. Frederick Starr, History Today
- Actually, Western Progress Stems from Christianity Nick Spencer, Theos
- Correcting for the Historian’s Middle Eastern Biases Luma Simms, Law & Liberty
Nightcap
- Whatever Happened to Patient Confidentiality? Irfan Khawaja, Policy of Truth
- What Critics Don’t Understand About Gun Culture David French, the Atlantic
- Making Guns Obsolete Frances Woolley, Worthwhile Canadian Initiative
- Can Libertarianism Be A Governing Philosophy? Michael Munger, Law & Liberty
Nightcap
- Don’t give the Feds anywhere to hide Scott Sumner, EconLog
- Tariff Truths and Income Tax Iniquities Brian Domitrovic, Law and Liberty
- A Proper Accounting of Glass-Steagall Daniel D Leger, American Affairs
- The new constitutional case against ObamaCare Ilya Somin, Volokh Conspiracy
Nightcap
- One-party systems loved by the Left, ignored by Trump Oliver Kamm, CapX
- George W Bush’s Forgotten Crimes Against Democracy James Bovard, the Hill
- Peshawar, Sicily, and the Fatal Conceit of Intervention Peter Miller, Views
- How to Seize the Moral High Ground Wayland Hunter, Liberty Unbound
10 Greatest Speeches of All Time
That’s the topic of my latest column over at RealClearHistory. Obviously, I took a break from my World War I-themed posts to do this one. Here is an excerpt:
4. Duty, Honor, Country speech by Douglas MacArthur: May 12, 1962. General Douglas MacArthur was a divisive figure in his day. For many, he was too martial for a constitutional republic, too outspoken for a General, and some of the policies he argued for (foreign and domestic) were a bit too hawkish for my stomach. William Manchester’s biography of Douglas MacArthur, American Caesar, helped show me how important republican governance was to the General, though. MacArthur thought deeply about republicanism and the effects that war had on a republican citizen’s virtues and characteristics. I have the slight advantage of having Manchester’s work on MacArthur etched into the back of my mind while reading through the latter’s speech, given to cadets at West Point two years before his death: “His name and fame are the birthright of every American citizen. In his youth and strength, his love and loyalty, he gave all that mortality can give. He needs no eulogy from me; or from any other man. He has written his own history and written it in red on his enemy’s breast.” You can read the whole speech here.
These columns are aimed at a different crowd that what I am used to here at NOL, but I think I do a pretty decent job of weaving rather mundane topics (great speeches from an American point of view) into the fabric of more fundamental questions about our global society. Read the rest to find out if I’m way off the mark on this one.
Nightcap
- The Forgotten Everyday Origins of ‘Craft’ Sarah Archer, the Atlantic
- Changes in the Nature of Work Jacques Delacroix, NOL
- Why America Can’t Go Swiss on Guns Kevin Sullivan, RealClearWorld
- Eccentric culture is what makes the West unique Rémi Brague, Montréal Review
Nightcap
- China Portrays Racism as a Western Problem the Economist
- Pure Racism and Chinese Dining Jacques Delacroix, NOL
- Imagining a New China Fiammetta Rocco, 1843
- A German’s View of China’s Rise Peter Gordon, Asian Review of Books
Nightcap
- The Left’s Double Standard on the Power of Media Madeline Grant, CapX
- What Happens Next for British Left? Zoe Williams, Times Literary Supplement
- Americans are richer and happier than Europeans Scott Sumner, EconLog
- South Africa decides Zimbabwe is an instruction manual Johnathan Pearce, Samizdata