- What do we mean by “meaning”? Scott Sumner, Money Illusion
- The Sōseki of Prague Duncan Stuart, 3:AM Magazine
- The Civic Sacred Cow Wayland Hunter, Liberty Unbound
- The (American) Civil War’s Most Infamous Atrocity Rick Brownell, Historiat
Links
Nightcap
- The science war Peter Boettke, Coordination Problem
- On wider access to culture Chris Dillow, Stumbling & Mumbling
- Spaceship Earth explores Culture Space Robin Hanson, Overcoming Bias
- The liberal dream is freedom plus groceries (and that’s okay) Brad DeLong, Grasping Reality
Nightcap
- What would it take to build a tower as high as outer space? Sun & Popescu, Aeon
- Progressive/libertarian: the alliance that isn’t Bryan Caplan, EconLog
- An atlas of diplomacy Francis Sempa, Asian Review of Books
- How to save the Catholic Church Rachel Lu, the Week
Nightcap
- The transformation of the liberal political tradition in the nineteenth century Pamela Nogales, Age of Revolutions
- Kurds have conditions for an alliance with Shiites in Iraq Omar Sattar, Al-Monitor
- Mau-Mauing Myself Harry Stein, City Journal
- Is the sharing economy exploitative? Per Bylund, Power & Market
RCH: 10 libertarian thoughts on the (American) Civil War
I went there. I did it. I dropped a doo-doo right in the middle of August, for all the world to see. An excerpt:
5. Shout-outs to Alexis de Tocqueville and Joseph Smith. Alexis de Tocqueville wrote the best book on America, ever. Joseph Smith founded the “American religion” (to quote Leo Tolstoy). Both men also saw that the north-south divide in the United States was bound to lead to future calamity. It wouldn’t be accurate to call their thoughts on the American divide “predictions,” but both men were outsiders in one form or another, and both men have etched their names into history. The French, who had lost Tocqueville just two years prior to the beginning of the Civil War, approach to the American bloodbath was to remain neutral (after consulting with the United Kingdom), and instead invade Mexico. Napoleon III invaded Mexico, in the name of free trade, late in 1861 and established a puppet monarchy, which angered the United States as it violated the Monroe Doctrine. However, there was not much the U.S. could do and Napoleon III did not abandon his puppet until early 1866, when it became apparent which side was victorious in the American Civil War. The French preferred normalized relations with the American republic to a puppet monarch in the Mexican one. The Mormons, for their part, largely sat out the Civil War. Volunteers from Utah helped guard the mail routes from Indian attacks, but other than that, the Mormons, who had not yet been assimilated into American society (indeed, they had only fled from violence in Missouri to Utah a few decades prior to the Civil War), were content to let both sides bleed.
Please, read the rest.
Nightcap
- The other side of broken windows Eric Klinenberg, New Yorker
- “Peace through strength” is weakening Putin at home Krishnadev Calamur, the Atlantic
- How to cleanse the Catholic Church Andrew Sullivan, Daily Intelligencer
- The garment of terrorism Azadeh Moaveni, London Review of Books
Nightcap
- Why Czechs don’t speak German Jacklyn Janeksela, BBC
- The Kurds, Sykes-Picot and the quest for redrawing borders Nick Danforth, BPC
- The language of the economy: prices Rick Weber, NOL
- A Balkan border change the West should welcome Marko Prelec, Politico EU
Nightcap
- Yoram Hazony and the New Nationalism Samuel Goldman, Modern Age
- The archive of comics sponsored by South Africa’s Apartheid government William Worger (interview), Africa is a Country
- Photo essay on the Soviet squelching of the Prague Spring Alan Taylor, the Atlantic
- Failed states and failed civilizations Nick Nielsen, The View from Oregon
Nightcap
- Confucianism and meritocracy James Hankins, American Affairs
- Lots of ideological axes to grind Scott Sumner, EconLog
- Did the notorious Zinoviev Letter ever exist? Alan Judd, Spectator
- That time when Chile conquered Peru and Bolivia Stefan Aguirre Quiroga, History Today
Nightcap
- Soccer, communists, fascists, and Yugoslavia Richard Mills (interview), Jacobin
- Over- and under-reactions in politics Chris Dillow, Stumbling & Mumbling
- How a controversial non-violent movement has transformed the Israeli-Palestinian debate Nathan Thrall, Guardian
- Sovereignty, confusion, and the international order Nick Danforth, War on the Rocks
Nightcap
- Reclaiming Full-Throttle Luxury Space Communism Aaron Winslow, Los Angeles Review of Books
- Elves and Aliens Nick Richardson, London Review of Books
- Imperialism, American-style Michael Auslin, Claremont Review of Books
- The Congo reform project: Too dark altogether Angus Mitchell, Dublin Review of Books
Nightcap
- The return of Henry George Pierre Lemieux, EconLog
- The politics of purity and indigenous rights Grant Havers, Law & Liberty
- The Ottoman Empire’s first map of the United States Nick Danforth, the Vault
- The age that women have babies: how a gap divides America Bui & Miller, the Upshot
Nightcap
- Death of a Marxist Vijay Prashad, The Hindu
- We’re on the threshold of a third wave of globalization. What should we expect? Branko Milanovic, globalinequality
- Turkey kills PKK’s leader in Iraq Amberin Zaman, Al-Monitor
- France’s second-class citizens Haythem Guesmi, Africa is a Country
10 horrific ways to die (RCH)
Yes, that’s the subject of my weekend column over at RealClearHistory. An excerpt:
4. Cutting off limbs/flaying. The English version of being hanged, drawn, and quartered involved removing genitals, but did any other society in history stoop so low? Um, yes. Not only have penises and/or testicles been removed and vaginas flayed, but they have sometimes been displayed as trophies, eaten, or converted into jewelry. Genitals aren’t the only limbs to have been removed over the years. Fingers and toes, tongues, breasts, eyes, ears, lips, nipples, noses, kneecaps, fingernails, eyelids, skin, and bones have all been forcibly removed over years by governments exacting punishment. Aside from the removal of genitals, flaying is probably the worst of the bunch. That’s when you beat somebody so hard that their skin comes off.
I had a lot of fun writing this, and I suspect my ever-so-patient editor had a lot of fun reading (and editing) it. I hope you enjoy it too! Here’s the rest of it.
Nightcap
- World War II and the point of Surrealism Sophie Haigney, 1843
- Is religion a universal in human culture? Brett Colasacco, Aeon
- Sikh pilgrimages: Hope for a religious corridor Tridivesh Singh Maini, The News
- For centuries, people thought lambs grew on trees Abbey Perreault, Atlas Obscura