- Losing the House may actually help Trump more than it hurts him James Rogers, Law & Liberty
- Tyler Cowen on the elections Marginal Revolution
- Clifford Geertz, radical objectivity, and elections Timothy Taylor, Conversable Economist
- Not wearing a poppy Chris Dillow, Stumbling & Mumbling
Links
Afternoon Tea: “The Winning of the West: The Expansion of the Western Sioux in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries”
There is, however, a second group of anthropologists, WW Newcomb, Oscar Lewis, Frank Secoy, and more recently Symmes Oliver, who have found this explanation of intertribal warfare unconvincing. These scholars, making much more thorough use of historical sources than is common among anthropologists, have examined warfare in light of economic and technological change. They have presented intertribal warfare as dynamic, changing over time; wars were not interminable contests with traditional enemies, but real struggles in which defeat was often catastrophic. Tribes fought largely for the potential economic and social benefits to be derived from furs, slaves, better hunting grounds, and horses. According to these scholars, plains tribes went to war because their survival as a people depended on securing and defending essential resources.
This is from Richard White, a historian at Stanford University. Here is a link.
Nightcap
- A review of Naipaul’s The Enigma of Arrival Jeffrey Folks, Modern Age
- Christians in Egypt are under attack…again Farid Farid, the Atlantic
- Mormons fight to be called by their full name Bruce Clark, Erasmus
- A Kazakh scam (post-socialism) Robert Drury, London Review of Books
Nightcap
- Why sadness is better than happiness Adam Roberts, Aeon
- Stan wojenny and memories of Poland in the 1980s Branko Milanovic, globalinequality
- Macron ramps up EU power play with pitch to liberals Maïa de La Baume, Politico
- Is This Gary Johnson’s Last Campaign? Todd Krainin, Reason
Afternoon Tea: “The Burdens of Subjecthood: The Ottoman State, Russian Fugitives, and Interimperial Law, 1774-1869”
This article analyzes the changing treaty law and practice governing the Ottoman state’s attitude toward the subjects of its most important neighbor and most inveterate rival: the Russian Empire. The two empires were linked by both migration and unfreedom; alongside Russian slaves forcibly brought to the sultans’ domains, many others came as fugitives from serfdom and conscription. But beginning in the late 18th century, the Ottoman Empire reinforced Russian serfdom and conscription by agreeing to return fugitives, even as the same treaties undermined Ottoman forced labor by mandating the return of Russian slaves. Drawing extensively on Ottoman archival sources, this article argues that the resulting interimperial regulations on unfreedom and movement hardened the empires’ human and geographic boundaries, so that for many Russian subjects, foreign subjecthood under treaty law was not a privilege, but a liability.
This is from Will Smiley, a historian at the University of New Hampshire. Here is the link.
Nightcap
- Israelis versus Jews Jonathan Bronitsky, Claremont Review of Books
- Silk, Slaves, and Stupas Peter Gordon, Asian Review of Books
- Erdoğan’s Flights of Fancy Kaya Genç, NY Review of Books
- Why Free Markets are Better than Globalism David Gordon, the Austrian
Nightcap
- The true face of Islam Ed Husain, Spectator
- Are American political parties realigning? Brady & Cain, National Affairs
- A nation obsessed with saying “sorry” Leslie Nguyen-Okwu, BBC
- Why we need ideology Ilya Somin, Volokh Conspiracy
RCH: Antarctic history
Longtime readers of NOL know I have a strange obsession with Antarctica, and the murder that happened on the continent earlier this week gave me the perfect opportunity to write about the southernmost continent for this weekend’s column at RealClearHistory. Behold, an excerpt:
6. The Gauss Expedition (1901-03). The Germans got in on the Antarctic act, too, even though Germany only formed as a country in 1871. The Gauss Expedition got trapped by ice for 14 months, but the gas balloon that the Germans brought along was put to good use while they were trapped. The photo above was taken in a balloon the Germans floated above their trapped ship. Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss, by the way, is one of history’s most important mathematicians, and many rank Gauss second only to Newton in mathematical importance.
You’ll have to read the whole thing if you want to see the photo (it really is a thing of beauty).
Nightcap
- Why did shamanism evolve in societies throughout the world? Thomas Hills, Aeon
- To each, their own God Matthew Leigh, History Today
- ‘I don’t know what will happen to us in Brazil’ Anna Jean Kaiser, Roads & Kingdoms
- A war without civilian deaths? Samuel Moyn, New Republic
Nightcap
- History of “blackface” not what you think Robert Cherry, RealClearHistory
- Luck and the improbable career of Ralph Bramel Lloyd Michael Adamson, RealClearHistory
- The Habsburg Empire as a warning for US, EU Todd Buchholz, RealClearHistory
- The de-civilising process Adrian Wooldridge, 1843
Nightcap
- Cameroon, Nigeria, and Ambazonia Adewale Maja-Pearce, London Review of Books
- Upholding the Jihadist’s Veto Rose & Mchangama, Quillette
- Russia’s Syria problem keeps getting worse Robert Hamilton, American Interest
- Monuments and Indian massacres (Denver edition) Karen Brady, Not Even Past
Nightcap
- Collapsing certainties: art and its social and cultural setting Partha Mitter, Cairo Review
- Native Americans: victims of bureaucracy Michael Adamson, the Freeman
- Native American reservations: “socialist archipelago” Andrei Znamenski, Mises Daily
- The rise of Russia’s GRU Military Intelligence Service Christian Esch, der Spiegel
RCH: The Successful Failure of Truman Assassination Attempt
The Truman assassination attempt by Puerto Rican nationalists is the topic of my Tuesday column over at RealClearHistory. An excerpt:
Torresola and Collazo didn’t have much of a plan. They took a train from NYC to D.C. and approached Blair House, planning to shoot their way to Truman. Torresola walked up to the guest house and shot guard Leslie Coffelt four times at point-blank range, and Collazo started a gun fight with several guards. Torresola tried to find Collazo, leaving Coffelt for dead, but Coffelt somehow managed to get off a shot and it hit Torresola in the head, immediately killing him. Collazo was shot several times but managed to survive. It was the heaviest and longest gun fight in Secret Service history.
Please, read the rest.
Nightcap
- Has there been a surge of anti-Semitism under and because of Trump? David Bernstein, Volokh Conspiracy
- Why do Brazilian evangelicals support Jair Bolsonaro? Eric Farnsworth, Providence
- Growing up in Yugoslavia (how I lost my past) Branko Milanovic, globalinequality
- Christianity in China: breaking eggs against a rock Ian Johnson, ChinaFile
Nightcap
- American Nightmare: the story of a prime FBI suspect in 1996 Atlanta Marie Brenner, Vanity Fair
- The disappearing conservative professor Jon Shields, National Affairs
- Why the British love the oak tree Philip Marsden, Spectator
- Russia, Turkey, and the fate of Idlib Ömer Özkizilcik, Cairo Review