Separatism (Secession) in Spain, and the Rest of the World

Separatist agitations in Spain have prompted some observers to reconsider the concept of secession as a viable option in politics again. The BBC has a very good report here, and the Economist has an even better one here.

When I was taking an Honors course on Western civilization and we got to the European Union, a thought immediately came to my head and I shared it with the class: does the European Union mean the demise of the big nation-states of Europe?

My hope is that it will, but my Professor and my Left-leaning classmates either thought ‘no’ or had not thought about this question at all. One sexy girl did think it was possible, though I think she was just humoring me so that I would ask her out on a date (yes, I did, but she couldn’t get into UCLA, though, so she ended up at Berkeley!).

I thought about the confederation of states in Europe that the EuroZone has created, and remembered that many regions within the nation-states of Europe have harbored separatist sentiments since being absorbed into the nation-states of Europe (sometimes hundreds of years ago, sometimes decades ago), as well as the peaceful split-up of Czechoslovakia into two states within the EuroZone.

The purpose of the nation-states was to streamline trade between regions by standardizing trading policy and eliminating parochial tariffs that regions within the nation-states had erected over the course of centuries. So, in what is now Germany, for example, there were hundreds of small states that each had their own economic policies, and most of these states had erected protectionist tariffs, even on neighboring states. The German state standardized trading policy in what is now Germany so that a tariff-free zone of trade eventually emerged within Germany. The federal set-up of the United States accomplished the same thing.

Now, though, the European Union has essentially taken the place of the nation-state as the chief entity in charge of standardizing trading policies in Europe. My line of thought leads me to conclude that this political setup is a great opportunity for regions that have been absorbed into larger nation-states to assert more fiscal (local taxes) and political (local elections) independence because of these region’s new interdependence with a larger part of the European economy thanks to the elimination of tariffs between the larger nation-states currently in place. In short, the confederation has provided the opportunity for smaller states to emerge while at the same time eliminating the parochial and self-defeating aspects (trade policy) of small state polities that often accompanies “smallness.” The best of both worlds has the chance to flower: local governance and total participation in world trade.

I realize that the EuroZone shot itself in the foot with the creation of a central bank and the attempts to delegate to itself ever more political power, but with these two blemishes notwithstanding the European Union is a good thing for both peace and prosperity.

The question of secession in political science has recently emerged as a good one for many scholars, but unfortunately their focus has tilted heavily towards Europe and Canada (Quebec and Nunavut). If we apply this concept to other regions of the globe – especially China, Africa, the Middle East and India – then the notions of violence and despotism that Westerners largely harbor towards these regions disappears.

I hope this makes sense. If it doesn’t you know where the ‘comments’ section is!

8 thoughts on “Separatism (Secession) in Spain, and the Rest of the World

  1. All the separatist streams in Russia were cleaned by Stalin several tenyears ago. All the republics such ass Belorussia are separated from us, and now this question is closed, I think…

    • As a fact, their war is between their own small republics and confession branches. And sometimes they act like terrorists again us and our peacemakers on Caucasus, ’cause “we can’t let them solve their problems by theirselves”. If our government let them live without acting from Russia’s side, I think that all this acts of terrorism from Caucasus in our country will end. It’s like a coal swamp: you can leave it alone, or can throw a small match into it – and it will burns for ages after.

    • If our government let them live without acting from Russia’s side, I think that all this acts of terrorism from Caucasus in our country will end. It’s like a coal swamp: you can leave it alone, or can throw a small match into it – and it will burns for ages after.

      Agreed. We have the same problem here in the United States with regard to policing the world.

      However, I have trouble digesting your first segment:

      As a fact, their war is between their own small republics and confession branches. And sometimes they act like terrorists again us and our peacemakers on Caucasus, ’cause “we can’t let them solve their problems by theirselves”.

      Russian soldiers as “peacemakers”? Really?

      There is no secessionist agitation whatsoever in the Caucasus? Russian troops are just there to keep the peace between the barbarian groups inhabiting the area?

      I think that a more elaborate explanation on this matter (the one between Russia and the breakaway Caucasus republics) is necessary. Perhaps you would be so kind as to write for this outlet: The Republic of Liberty

  2. hummmmmmmmm, first time here, comments are from wannbe intelectual college kids pretending to comprehend what is going on in the world. Their opinions appear to be based on nothing more than the propaganda from the country they are from.

Please keep it civil

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s