“Since March 1996, Iraq has systematically sought to deny weapons inspectors from the United Nations Special on Iraq Commission (UNSCOM) access to key facilities and documents, has on several occasions endangered the safe operation of UNSCOM helicopters transporting UNSCOM personnel in Iraq, and has persisted in a pattern of deception and concealment regarding the history of its weapons of mass destruction programs […]
On August 14 — the President signed Public Law 105-235, which declared that “the Government of Iraq is in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations” and urged the President to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligation […]
It should be he policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.”
The first paragraph is from the Iraq Liberation Act of ___ .
The second and third paragraphs are from Public-Law 105-235.
The president who signed both items was ___________?
This is lifted from the Wall Street Journal of 3/19/13. The bolding is mine.
Both pieces of legislation were enacted in 1998.
The primary reason given by the Bush administration for the attack on Hussein’s Iraq was to search there for weapons of mass destruction. We now know there were no such weapons on any significant scale. I keep arguing on this blog that:
- There were many other reasons to destroy the Hussein regime and,
- There were very good reasons for any reasonable person to be misled about the existence of such weapons in Iraq.
Mostly, it was that the Hussein regime sabotaged the inspection process to which it had agreed as a condition of peace following the first Gulf War. It would be hard to understand the high risks taken to hide things by one who had in fact nothing to hide! (Read this sentence again.)
The important persons and organization who were fooled into believing in the existence of the non-existent Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were numerous and varied. They included several western intelligence services and many important politicians.
In 1998, a prominent member of one of the two main American political parties (prominent then and prominent now) said the following,
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
I am not faulting the politician who said this for blindness then but for irresponsible, dishonest amnesia now.
The politician in question is __________________________
(Answer below as a “Comment.”)
The quote is lifted from the Wall Street Journal editorial on 3/20/13.