Some Mistakes Have Been Made

I just finished up the readings for a class on the history of the modern Middle East. The main book issued is one conveniently written by the professor of the course (James Gelvin) and is aptly titled The Modern Middle East: A History. Below is an excerpt that I think sums up the problems facing the Middle East today:

American policy towards the Middle East [after World War 2] was instrumental in promoting both development and the civic order development was to sustain […] To promote development, the United States adopted a multifaceted approach derived, in good measure, from its own Depression-era wartime experiences.


Here is Murray Rothbard’s America’s Great Depression. Now, I know libertarians are infamous for condescending suggestions to “go read a book”, but I don’t think we can really help it sometimes. Hoover’s interventionist policies and Roosevelt’s New Deal were disastrous for the American economy. Most, if not all, of the Middle East’s problems today can be traced to the institutions currently in place, and these institutions in their turn were created and codified based upon models that had entirely failed the West.

For the record, the developmentalist approach led directly to, you guessed it, economic nationalism and political despotism. You can find a convenient ranking of the world’s states based off of GDP (PPP) per capita here. According to the IMF, the US ($48,387) is ranked 6th in the world (the US also repealed or rebuked many of the Depression-era policies of the Hoover and Roosevelt administrations; the few that remain are among the most pressing problems American society faces today). The world average is $11,489. Egypt is ranked 104th, Iraq is 128th, Iran is 69th (coming in slightly above the world average at $13,053), and Syria is 118th.

3 thoughts on “Some Mistakes Have Been Made

    • Brilliant! Thanks for sharing. My favorite part:

      What would make this peace plan work is that its land equalization is complementary to its confederate governance. The political struggle for land would be transformed into an economic marketplace where those who use the land compensate the others for their use of their common homeland. Citizens would have to pay a price for any attempt to occupy land simply for the sake of national holdings.

      Unlike the situation in Lebanon, the Confederation would have everyone living under diverse authorities. In Lebanon, there was an attempt to have one government with shared power, and that failed.

      The ability of the residents of the Levant to choose their citizenship periodically would provide a check against oppression in any of the states even where citizens of one state resided in the territory of another. Their own state as well as the Confederation would provide leverage against domination by that state.

      As David Bergland (1989) has said, “utopia is not one of the options.” The plan would not create a utopia, and I do not wish to minimize the problems of reconciling decades of hostility. But when Sadat visited Israel, years of hatred vanished as the Israelis cheered the man who wished to make peace. Israelis and Palestinians don’t have to like one another to live in peace. If a feeling of justice permeates the land, if past wrongs are redressed, when each is an equal citizen and in control of his destiny, then the foundation for harmony will be laid.

      I hope everybody out there reads the whole thing.

Please keep it civil

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s