- Against Seriousness
- When Food Isn’t the Answer to Hunger
- Fiscal Consolidation in Earlier British History
- *Must Read* HAP vs. RR vs. the Pundits: Scoring the Reinhart, Rogoff Dispute
Sorry for the lack of posts lately. I’ve been busy.
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Notes On Liberty 
This is for Brandon:
A question: If you were 100% convinced that Assad of Syria had used chemical weapons on civilians, would it affect your judgment about the desirability of American intervention in Syria?
[…] Delacroix asks: If you were 100% convinced that Assad of Syria had used chemical weapons on civilians, would it […]
[…] Dr Delacroix has recently left a question in the form of a comment that I think deserves to be answered. He asks: […]
[…] question that many of you will assume I am answering was clearly (and emphatically) intended for someone […]
[…] The question that many of you will assume I am answering was clearly (and emphatically) intended for someone else, so instead of answering it I’ll be making comments that, given the timing and the subject matter, just happen to answer the question anyways. I don’t want to do so directly because I would prefer it if Dr. Delacroix kept pestering Brandon and left me out of it. I do not want to draw his ire. I’m too busy with other things. So, this piece, and it’s similarity to recent pieces by Brandon and Andrew is coincidence and nothing more, I assure you. Just so you are not totally confused by what I am referring to, here is the question (that I remind you I am not specifically or directly answering): […]