How to Extirpate Poverty

To “extirpate” means to complete eliminate, from the Latin word meaning to pull out by stem and root. To extirpate poverty means to eliminate its cause, so that it does not come back. Fundamentally, poverty comes from a low wage level, so we need to examine what makes a wage level low.

The wage level of an economy can be thought of as the wages paid to unskilled people. Those with greater skill and talent get higher wages, so some think that the solution to poverty is better education. But a stagnant economy also depresses the return to human capital, the extra wage for those who are more productive. In a thriving productive economy, even those with few skills are better off than skilled labor in a depressed economy. Indeed, in an unproductive economy, those with skills often find little market for their human capital.

The wage level of an economy is set by marginal labor, those who work at the least productive land in use. The classical “law of wages” says that when workers are mobile, the wage at the margin of production will set the wage level for the rest of the economy.

The margin of production has several edges. There is the horizontal extensive margin of land that is just barely worth using, land so unproductive it fetches no rent. There is the vertical extensive margin of the space above a city, into which taller buildings can rise, without increasing the site rent. There is also the intensive margin of adding more workers to land already being used. The wage at the intensive margin will equalize to that of the extensive margin. Workers are paid what they add to production, which is called their marginal product.As explained by the economist Henry George in his book Progress and Poverty, the margin of production moves out farther and faster to less productive land when people can hold land even if they don’t use it. Those who want to use land must then push the margin to less productive land, which lowers the wage and increases the rent. After paying for labor and capital goods, what is left is land rent. As the margin of production moves to ever less productive land, wages fall and rent rises.

We can raise wages and reduce rent by avoiding the under-use of land, moving the workers back to more productive land. Land is used most productively when the rent is collected for public revenue or for distribution among the residents. Land is then not worth holding unless one uses it in its most productive use, since the rent paid to the community is based on the highest and best use of the land.

This would involve a tax shift, in which taxes that come from wages are replaced by public revenue from land rent, or from voluntary payments by folks who receive an equal share of the rent. Workers would get a double gain: higher wages from putting land to its most productive use, and the gain from keeping one’s full wage.

A complete efficiency tax shift would also eliminate taxes on interest, business profits, dividends, and value added. The increase in investment would make the economy grow faster, raising the wage level until poverty is extinguished.

The reason why poverty does not disappear today is that much of the gain from an economic expansion ends up increasing land rent rather than wages. If the rent is used for common benefits or distributed equally, then the public would benefit from both higher wages and a share of the greater rent. The elimination of wage taxes would also stimulate investment in human capital, since the reward would be higher. There would be more self-employment and more entrepreneurship.

The collection of the land rent would also eliminate economic depressions. The capture of economic expansion gains by land rent and land value spurs land speculation that carries the price of land so high it is no longer affordable. Investment slows down, causing a recession. This is what we witnessed during the past few years. The abolition of depressions would eliminate the cyclical poverty of hard times in depressed economies.

Governments today do not extirpate poverty. They treat the symptoms with assistance for food, shelter, and medicine. The poor fall into a poverty trap, since getting a job implies a loss of the welfare benefits. The highest tax rates are on the poor seeking to escape poverty, since they have to pay taxes, pay to take care of children, pay for transit, and they lose the free benefits. There then develops a culture of poverty, where children are brought up to see themselves as victims who can at best just beg for more welfare favors.

Only the efficiency tax shift, replacing taxes on wages with taxes on land rent, will go to the root cause of poverty, and pull out those roots. Anything else just makes the poor feel better, but they remain poor. As Henry George write in his book Social Problems, “There is in nature no reason for poverty.” There is no poverty in heaven because everyone there has an equal share of the heavenly places, and their activities are not hampered with taxes. To extirpate poverty, let us do on earth what is done in heaven.

[Editor’s note: this essay first appeared on Dr. Foldvary’s blog, the Foldvarium, on Dec 21 2008]

One thought on “How to Extirpate Poverty

  1. There is all kinds of discussion regarding the poor and how to eliminate poverty almost past the point of ad-nauseous to real throwing up. If poverty is to be eliminated, at least in enlightened Western societies, people need to stop talking, whining, and begging and get off of their lazy asses and work at school, on the job, in their personal quests for happiness and spiritual fulfillment…or as Nike’s slogan suggests: “Just Do It”.

    Anyone who thinks equality in “shares of the heavenly places” has not read or studied the “Tragedy of the Commons”

    I agree that all citizens must share equally in their tax burden. We all want protection from criminals, foreign invaders and we all want a court system where we are assumed innocent until proven guilty and a system of laws that are clear, concise and unambiguous. All of that needs to be paid for and since each of us, under laws proscribed based upon impartiality and without regard to wealth or status, our taxes should be structured likewise – impartially and without regard to wealth, status or lack of the same. Each citizen should have to pay and have a stake in the “game”, if for no other reason than to give them pause to educate themselves when tax increases are threatened and their pocketbooks are already stretched to capacity.

    If one want’s people to morph into an educated public concerned for the rights of all men, then, one needs to assign a burden to all that grabs their attention, holds their interest and encourages them to loosen their tongues when it comes to defending freedom. One can claim to be a free man, but without economic freedom, options and choices become limited and for some, non-existent. The biggest driver of economic oppression of the so-called poor is taxes resulting from spending beyond the means of the nation.

    While the top down does or desires the bulk of spending by the government, the bottom up are the individuals who are most harmed by political and economic irresponsibility. So, when a poor person hears a politician say that he or she wants to improve that person’s lot in live with “new or expanded spending” while the nation is carrying an obscene debt – buyer beware. Get off of your ass, study the world around you, become informed enough to speak out and demand policies that promote liberty and the opportunity to become better off than you are now. Let’s not settle for “equal shares of the heavenly places” where one person works hard to supply a common pool while another works not at all but drains the pool without conscience or contribution. Let’s get a clue.

Please keep it civil

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s